| For Fred Supporters: If Fred Thompson drops out of the race, which major candidate would you support? Show Poll Showing comments 281-290 of 293.
Page: First Page ...25 26 27 28 29 30 | |
From Nemo on January 20, 2008 at 3:32 pm. IP Logged, 68.192.189.x Report Abuse The nomination of any of the above four will fracture the Republican electorate and guarantee the presidency of Hillary Clinton. You dont seriously believe the Democrat party leadership would allow a black man to become president, do you? Their advocacy of affirmative action goes only so far. If Huckabee is nominated, the MSM will turn on him immediately as the Christian answer to Ayatollah Khomeini while gleefully pointing out that this guitar-plucking fraud is, in fact, an aw-shucks bull-flopper who knows zilch about the role of the U.S. in the world today. If McCain is nominated there is a good chance that a sizable number of conservative Republicans will not vote on election day, reasoning that, at the conclusion of the Lizard Queen's reign, the Reagan Coalition will arise as a phoenix from the ashes and retake the Republic. (Good luck with all of THAT.) If Rudy is nominated you can kiss the Evangelical vote goodbye - ditto for most of the South, since he is an Italian from New YAWK - with an annoying lisp, no less. If Mitt is nominated, most of the Republican electorate will hold their noses (yet again) and vote for him - except for the Bible-thumpers, on whom you can count to pretty much boycott the election, which will be rather a shame, seeing as how it will be about as close as the election was in 2000. Their bigoted refusal to vote for (gasp) a Mormon will cost the Repubs the election and effectively roll out the red carpet for Her Thighness. After that, le deluge.  From Mr Bushmills in reply to Nemo on January 20, 2008 at 3:50 pm. IP Logged, 70.16.225.x Report Abuse I like all your comments, Nemo, similar to my own, but try not being so Herself Hillary, Lady Disdainful of hillbillies for that sake alone. I'm a guitar-pluckin' aw-shucks bull-flopper myself,who, 1) iain't a fraud and 2) is it right on the mark with you...so far. Try being more charitable.
mrsbushmmill.townhall.com
From Nemo in reply to Mr Bushmills on January 20, 2008 at 5:00 pm. IP Logged, 68.192.189.x Report Abuse My Dear Mr. Bushmills, Kindly accept my apologies if my observations were framed in language that was less than charitable. Having the singular misfortune of being born a Yankee, I was not fortunate to have been exposed to the gentility that is the hallmark of high Southern culture. As you well know, sir, Northerners tend to stomp when a mere tap of foot would otherwise suffice. Nevertheless, given that you have declared yourself not a fraud, I seriously doubt that you are a bull-flopper. As we all know there is a fine line between a polished raconteur and a bull-flopper and Mr. Huckabee appears to broad-jumped over it long ago. Hopefully, this Yankee's apology and clarification will warrant your indulgence, as it would grieve me considerably to be considered a "damn Yankee." Best regards, Nemo Particularis
From Evan on January 20, 2008 at 3:23 pm. IP Logged, 71.211.21.x Report Abuse I'm a Romney guy 1st so I did not vote in the pole, but if the tables were turned I would happily vote for Fred. To the Fredheads, I'm sorry he did not do better in SC. If Huck were to get it - I would stay home.
If McCain were to get it - I might, maybe, go vote - it would be tough. Joe - I like Medved but he has it worse for McCain than Hugh has it for Romney, and that's saying something!!! From Mike on January 20, 2008 at 3:17 pm. IP Logged, 24.245.60.x Report Abuse I don't like any of the remaining choices, particularly Romney the panderer, who's winning this poll. I'd have to go for Rudy even though I question his conservative bona fides. For the pro-life folks, who cares what his stance is? It's a question of judges and he would nominate conservative judges. From irbis on January 20, 2008 at 3:04 pm. IP Logged, 24.215.179.x Report Abuse If you want to oppose Bush tax cut, give amnesty to 30-100 million illegals (including the future ones know there will always be next amnesty), then McCain is your man. If you do not like that, then options are pretty limited. Yes, Mitt is the only hope to stop Mcamnesty. From Mike on January 20, 2008 at 2:47 pm. IP Logged, 71.48.251.x Report Abuse If McCain is the Republican nominee, I will sit this one out...better to re-build than to follow McCain to the gates of hell. He is wrong on the key issue: amnesty, free speech, taxes, and the environment. The best alternative to Fred is Mitt. Conservatives have no other choice in this election. From Joe on January 20, 2008 at 2:45 pm. IP Logged, 76.121.127.x Report Abuse From Michelle in reply to Joe on January 20, 2008 at 2:59 pm. IP Logged, 66.188.246.x Report Abuse Uh, Joe, I would take whatever Michael Medved says with a lot of salt. Michael is in the middle of a love-fest with McCain and Huckabee---neither of them can say or do no wrong. He skews just about everything to line up with his way of thinking.
Page: First Page ...25 26 27 28 29 30
 Add a Comment
|