From Jcwarxik on November 7, 2009 at 12:12 pm. IP Logged, 203.82.73.x Report Abuse comment2  From Btwgkzws on November 6, 2009 at 10:13 am. IP Logged, 120.28.64.x Report Abuse comment2 From Yoeyhrur on November 6, 2009 at 4:54 am. IP Logged, 168.10.168.x Report Abuse comment1 From Ieflvqwd on November 5, 2009 at 11:58 pm. IP Logged, 77.88.66.x Report Abuse comment5 From Ejlvojia on November 5, 2009 at 1:55 pm. IP Logged, 114.127.246.x Report Abuse comment3 From daria on August 18, 2009 at 6:57 pm. IP Logged, 202.188.222.x Report Abuse YvlL1n Gra7noI59Unral92Bb7wf From wdefrg on June 18, 2009 at 4:47 am. IP Logged, 64.22.92.x Report Abuse From jeni on May 20, 2009 at 4:42 am. IP Logged, 60.243.116.x Report Abuse thanks for this[urlhttp://merchant-navy-jobs.blogspot.com]shipping jobs[/url] From sammy on April 5, 2009 at 2:25 am. IP Logged, 200.41.60.x Report Abuse f7xQOm vkoo7wvY5Xkfak7bf1Th From Rhiannon on January 18, 2009 at 6:17 pm. IP Logged, 209.90.90.x Report Abuse The PBS show NOW this week did a feature on a similar situation in southern CA where the local energy company would not commit to the fact that the transmission station and wiring it was looking for permission to build would only be used for green energy even though that was the purpose for it in the beginning. I don't get it. The money that it costs to build these sort of "dinosaur" projects could be channeled into retrofitting houses and buildings with their own generation systems. It seems a much more safe and sane way to go, local generation of the energy needed instead of dependency upon a national grid. But then, what do I know? 
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Showing comments 21-30 of 59.  Add a Comment
|